"The Lie Shall Set You Free!"

   
 
 
 

If you believe that, I've got some ocean front property...

It's definitely nice to have absolutes . . . I think. Without absolutes everything becomes relative and the difference between right and wrong is determined by a poll of 648 adults. When sin becomes a subject open for debate, it is a clear sign that people are doing "that which is right in their own eyes."
I'm not a naysayer, and am generally optimistic (or at least that is what everyone in my 12-step group says) but the signs are so obvious that I feel it is my duty as an oxygen inhaler to acknowledge them. The signs point to the destruction of America. An America not unlike "The Postman." Not the actual post apocalyptic America portrayed in "The Postman," but the movie itself.
The days are at hand (that sounds biblical doesn't it?) when America will crumble from the inside out due to its own moral and economic decadence. The two termites responsible for this erosion of the American fiber are lust and greed.
It just so happens (isn't that convenient?) that recent events leave us with a vivid picture of the cancer that will bring about America's demise. The recent scandal involving President Clinton is not the cancer, but it serves as a good test to determine the cancer's severity.
For starters, I refuse to jump on the bandwagon that declares the president guilty (or at least not publicly) before the facts are out. The way I see it, Clinton tells so many half-truths that on average half the time he's telling the truth. This gives him an even split on the allegations that he had an affair with "that" 21 year old intern, Monica Lewinsky. Of course, if you throw in Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey and Gennifer Flowers the odds are stacked.
The most telling evidence of America's decay is not, however, the actions of one man. It is in the fact that most of America believes that he did have an affair (48% according to Time), and that they don't care (?% according to Newsweek). The majority of America believes that what one does in the private life does not affect public policy and the ability to lead a nation (?%).
Being that America is embracing such wishful thinking, I believe that the time is ripe for me to openly embrace my belief in unicorns and gummy bears (you know, the "bouncing here and there and everywhere . . . we are the gummy bears"). And while I don't have the facts to support me, I do want to get my beliefs in print (in case they turn out to be true), that Donald Trump is, in fact, Uncle Scrooge and I'm Huey.
A simple example that should show any logical person the fallacy in the notion that the personal and public life does not mix, is James Bond. He never mixes business with pleasure, and yet every "girlfriend" of his is either killed by the bad guys, or somehow caught and has to be rescued by him. Separating the personal and public life of anyone is tantamount to dividing between peanut butter and chocolate, fish and chips, Mickey and Minnie, or Papa and Brainy Smurf. It just can't be done.
The way that America's false logic regarding the public and personal Bill, is a matter of willful ignorance or simple self-deception. For example, there is an argument today as to whether or not oral sex is even a sin, or if it violates the marriage vow. The Bible, not to mention state and national laws, is very clear on these points. You have to want to make it confusing.
Why would anyone want to confuse it? Simple, lust and greed.
The economy is good, and people feel that any change will affect their "economic prosperity" (i.e. worship of money), so they refuse to shake the boat over such a piddly issue as sex, lies and audiotape. This is in spite of the fact that if the same man was teaching their children they would have his head. I Guess we know what is more important to most Americans, don't we?
Mrs. Limbaugh observed that the reason people put up with President Clinton's philandering is that "he makes us comfortable with our weaknesses." It is easier to idolize Princess Diana, who was full of failures, than to idolize Mother Teresa, who was not. If you can be as good, if not better, than your idol or your leader, just think of how comfortable that would make you feel. This is the essence of her argument. And if lust is a vice that you would rather not part with, why not become comfortable with it?
Another key to understanding the response of most Americans is to understand how people respond to others with the same weaknesses that they have. Guilty people either tend to excuse the failures of another, or judge these failures too harshly. The first response is given to friends, the second is reserved for enemies, or so it seems.
This is where the Church, I believe, must come in. We must be transparent with our own failings - otherwise we are hypocrites - while still holding to the absolutes of Scripture and as Americans, the Constitution.
While I believe that we need to pray for President Clinton (we should all pray for Clinton and our nation), his need for prayer does not negate the countries need for justice. There has to be a balance between mercy (which is what most of America wants) and justice (which is what a society must have to survive).
Interestingly enough, if Clinton had been wise, he would have confessed to the Lewinsky affair, and the Paula Jones sexual harassment suit (even if he hadn't committed them) and America would have already forgiven him. Instead the cover-up is what may destroy him. Could there be a lesson hidden in here about repentance and confession? Go to www.philip.yahoo.luke.gov.jk and make your cyber vote count.
I am one of those Americans who would have forgiven Clinton if he had just admitted to it. Instead, he denies everything behind double negatives ("I didn't ask anybody not to tell the truth"), ambiguities ("I've caused pain in my marriage) and outright deception ("the president was never alone in the hotel with Paula Jones" - the allegation is that they were alone in a hotel room). At this point, the issue is not about whether you like or dislike Bill Clinton, the issue is whether or not you love the truth.
As Christians we must hold out mercy and forgiveness to those who trespass, even if they don't ask for it. At the same time we must also serve as oracles of God, and boldly proclaim that the wages of sin is death, and that Jesus is returning to judge the world. How do we balance the two? Aye, now there's the rub.
Speaking of judgement and the end of history (or humanities), this is the part of the lecture that you'll need to know for the test. Besides I think Mrs. Buckles saw you reading the paper.
Alternate ending (obviously not the ending that was published):
First, we must know the truth of the word of God, not what we think it says, but what it really says. There is even some argument today as to whether or not oral sex is even a sin, or if it violates the marriage vow. The Bible is very clear, you have to want to make it confusing on this point. Second, we must be honest about our own failures to God and others. Third, we must pray and forgive. No matter what anyone does God still loves him or her. So must we. And finally we must be the salt of the world, declaring the truth of God's word and that sin is sin, and that God is not mocked. Oh, and we have to live lives that are examples to others. Live pure private lives so that our public lives are not discounted.
I believe that nothing less the integrity of the office of President, and ultimately the future of our nation depends upon whether the truth is found, and justice is done. Anything less would be uncivilized.
For in the end we all must stand at the cross and determine whether we will repent and fall on the mercy of Christ, or deny and fall on the judgement of the lion of Judah.
 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
   
by Philip Pfanstiel
© 1998 The Philip Pfiles published Feb 4, 1998